Hey

[liEB]

Hey Eli here from TDW
I once posted on here saying I thought there was a ripped tutorial on this site from another (That no longer matters btw), now here I am again
Alrighty..
I believe this is the original:
http://thedesignworld.com/photoshop-...nge-interface/
And this is the rip:
http://biorust.com/tutorials/detail/58/us/

Not saying at all that you guys ripped it, as its by 'DeathxDesign' and they're site no longer exists..
Honestly i believe TDW's is the original

[Man1c M0g]

I dunno... perhaps Blake is the name of the DeathxDesign author? He did say that he wouldn't keep that tutorial exclusive to this webby....

Oh, and If you want to play the ripping game, your tutorial over at http://thedesignworld.com/photoshop-...rid-signature/ is a definate rip of http://www.biorust.com/tutorials/detail/27/en/ - a technique which has actually been published in books under our name for some time now.

I'll give you a choice over this one. Shall we let both tutorials live? Or will I agree to delete my grunge tut in return for you deleting your electrical pathways tut? The choice is yours (although for sake of avoiding the hard work involved in remaking the grunge tutorial, I'd prefer just to let both live, lol!).

[liEB]

The electric effect is a definite rip? But the images aren't the same, the steps aren't the same
Ryan supposedly made the grunge interface tutorial, and all the images are exactly the same on biorust, that's called a definite rip

Maybe you should find this Blake and find out his story =/
What d'you think?

[Man1c M0g]

RYAN made the tutorial? But on your own site it clearly says 'BLAKE' in the credits. Oh, and you might like to see the date on this page: http://www.capitaltutorials.com/auth...=5&view=&sort= - it clearly lists the addition date to their 3rd-party (and therefore independant) index as October 3, 2004, whereas the date on YOUR tutorial authorage is Mon 10 January 2005. Oh, and just for reference, our internal timestamp is 2004-06-21, although I don't expect you to believe that one as its internal and therefore corruptable.

There remains little doubt, however, that mine predates yours and could clearly not be a copy... unless you believe in time travel. Perhaps you should contact this BLAKE character yourself and check up on his story? After all, it is you who is making the accusations, and therefore you who should be doing the legwork to prove me wrong...

[liEB]

Damn! I do say you owned me I never saw that it gives credit to Blake.. weird
I guess we should forget this ever happened.. ?
Sorry ..

[Man1c M0g]

Consider it forgotten.