Old 08-02-2005   #1 (permalink)
Sheep Worrier
 
Man1c M0g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portsmouth, UK.
Posts: 4,105
Blog Entries: 14

Send a message via ICQ to Man1c M0g Send a message via MSN to Man1c M0g Send a message via Skype™ to Man1c M0g
The Photographer's Right e-Pamphlet

You may think you live in a free country, but try and take pictures of industrial buildings and you may find yourself confronted with an angry security card. Tempting as it may be, giving him/her the finger might not be the best idea. A far better response is to know your rights and how to exercise them properly. Here's a snippet from Bert P. Krages' website on 'The Photographer's Right'

<table width="90%" align="center" border="0"><tr><td><p align="justify">The right to take photographs is under assault now more than ever. People are being stopped, harassed, and even intimidated into handing over their personal property simply because they were taking photographs of subjects that made other people uncomfortable. Recent examples have included photographing industrial plants, bridges, and bus stations. For the most part, attempts to restrict photography are based on misguided fears about the supposed dangers that unrestricted photography presents to society.

Ironically, unrestricted photography by private citizens has played an integral role in protecting the freedom, security, and well-being of all Americans. Photography in the United States has contributed to improvements in civil rights, curbed abusive child labor practices, and provided important information in investigating crimes. These images have not always been pretty and often have offended the sensibilities of governmental and commercial interests who had vested interests in a status quo that was adverse to most other people.

Photography has not contributed to a decline in public safety or economic vitality in the United States. When people think back on the acts of terrorism that have occurred over the last forty years, none have depended on or even involved photography. Restrictions on photography would not have prevented any of these acts. Similarly, some corporations have a history of abusing the rights of photographers under the guise of protecting their trade secrets. These claims are almost always meritless because entities are required to keep trade secrets from public view if they want to protect them. Trade secret laws do not give anyone the right to restrain photographers from taking photographs in public places.

The Photographer's Right is a downloadable guide that is loosely based on the ACLU's Bust Card and the Know Your Rights flyer. It may be downloaded and printed out using Adobe Acrobat Reader. You may make copies and carry them your wallet, pocket, or camera bag to give you quick access to your rights and obligations concerning confrontations over photography. You may distribute the guide to others ,provided that such distribution is not done for commercial gain and credit is given to the author.
</td></tr></table>
Interested in reading more? Check out the website!
__________________
Man1c M0g is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 AM.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

Design & Content © BioRUST 2008 :: PRIVACY STATEMENT :: LEGAL INFORMATION :: ADVERTISING MEDIA KIT